Posts Tagged ‘Chick-fil-A’

Russia jails Pussy Riot Trio for two years for hooliganism in ‘show trial’; Former world chess champion Garry Kasparov dragged away

August 18, 2012

As the outcry continues after the anti-Putin Pussy Riot singers were jailed for two years over a 50-second cathedral protest, former world chess champion Garry Kasparov was arrested for his protestations outside the court.

After today’s staggering news, leader of the opposition, the mild-mannered Kasparov was shown in forceful terms that the the Russian security forces are clamping down on unrest.

The pictures clearly show Kasparov being manhandled by the Russian police as a growing clamour of disbelief begins to spread at the severe sentencing.

By Will Stewart,
The Daily Mail (London)

Scroll down video

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2189771/Pussy-Riot-punk-band-members-jailed-2-years-Russian-court-hooliganism-motivated-religious-hatred.html#ixzz23rNk8mFB

Arrested: Police officers detain former world chess champion Garry Kasparov, a leading opposition activist, outside the court

Arrested: Police officers detain former world chess champion Garry Kasparov, a leading opposition activist, outside the court

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2189771/Pussy-Riot-punk-band-members-jailed-2-years-Russian-court-hooliganism-motivated-religious-hatred.html#ixzz23rOKAUD8

In you go: The detaining of Kasparov shows the hard line the Russian security forces are taking

n you go: The detaining of Kasparov shows the hard line the Russian security forces are taking

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2189771/Pussy-Riot-punk-band-members-jailed-2-years-Russian-court-hooliganism-motivated-religious-hatred.html#ixzz23rOT7OVq

In what many viewed as a ‘show trial’, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, and Maria Alyokhina, 24, who both have children, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 30, sat behind a glass wall as Judge Marina  Syrova convicted them of ‘hooliganism motivated by religious hatred’.

In a  judgement lasting almost two hours, the judge – who has only once given a not guilty verdict in 179 hearings – ruled that the trio showed ‘clear disrespect to society’ by staging their ‘Punk Prayer’ in Moscow’s biggest cathedral on February 21 when they belted out a raucous chorus calling on the Virgin Mary to ‘drive out Putin’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2189771/Pussy-Riot-punk-band-members-jailed-2-years-Russian-court-hooliganism-motivated-religious-hatred.html#ixzz23rOZ9s3M

Time to reflect: The Pussy Riot band members show the court's written verdict as they sit in a glass cage surrounded by the world's media

Time to reflect: The Pussy Riot band members show the court’s written verdict as they sit in a glass cage surrounded by the world’s media

They had offended the feelings of Orthodox believers, she added, before sentencing them to ‘two years deprivation of  liberty in a penal colony’.

The verdict – which could see them sent to Siberian labour camps – is likely to spark a weekend of protest in Russia and in cities around the world.

Their two years will count from their arrest so they can expect releases in March 2014 unless pardoned by Putin.

But Russian dissident and blogger Alexei Navalny said: ‘They are in jail because it is Putin’s personal revenge.

‘This verdict was written by Vladimir Putin.’

Undaunted: Sitting together, Yekaterina Samutsevich (left ), Maria Alyokhina (centre) and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova smiled as the guilty verdict was read out
Undaunted: Sitting together, Yekaterina Samutsevich (left ), Maria Alyokhina (centre) and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova smiled as the guilty verdict was read out
The women, two of whom have young children, were charged with hooliganism connected to religious hatred but the case is widely seen as a warning that authoritie
The women, two of whom have young children, were charged with hooliganism connected to religious hatred but the case is widely seen as a warning that authorities will only tolerate opposition under tightly controlled conditions
On trial: The three women are escorted before the court hearing today in Moscow
On trial: The three women are escorted before the court hearing today in Moscow
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, right,
Yekaterina Samutsevich, right,

Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, right, are led into the court wearing handcuffs

In London a fortnight ago for the Olympics, Putin had said the women ‘should not be judged too severely’. Yesterday calls were starting for a boycott of the 2014 Winter Olympics in the Russian city of Sochi.

While the sentence for ‘hooliganism motivated by religious hatred’ was relatively light compared with the seven-year maximum, the case is widely seen as a ‘show trial’ warning to others daring to challenge Putin’s ‘authoritarian rule’.

The trio had expected no mercy for their political protest. Tolokonnikova said shortly before the verdict, which she assumed was written in the Kremlin: ‘I do not believe in this court. There is no court. It is an illusion.’

Russian opposition leader Kasparov, the former chess world champion, was one of dozens arrested outside the court in a huge security clampdown.

A topless women's rights activist hacked down a Christian cross in the Ukrainian capital Kiev with a chain saw today in protest at the prosecution.
An activist of the Ukrainian feminist group Femen uses a chainsaw

A topless women’s rights activist hacked down a Christian cross in the Ukrainian capital Kiev with a chain saw on Friday in protest at the prosecution of the Russian feminist punk band, Pussy Riot

Later there were claims he was beaten but also that he bit a policeman, which could mean he will face charges.

The US denounced the sentences as ‘disproportionate’.

Western campaigners were led by Sir Paul McCartney and Madonna in the run-up to the trial.

Yesterday Amnesty International dubbed  the court’s ruling a ‘bitter blow’ to freedom of expression in Russia.

In London, around 50 people gathered at the Royal Court theatre in a show of support for the women.

Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt said: ‘I am deeply concerned by the sentencing of three members of the band Pussy Riot, which can only be considered a disproportionate response to an expression of political belief.’

Supporters of feminist punk group Pussy Riot stand behind barricades surrounding a court, in Moscow, Russia
Supporters of feminist punk group Pussy Riot stand behind barricades surrounding a court, in Moscow, Russia
International support: Demonstrators wear hoods and hold banners reading in Bulgarian
International support: Demonstrators wear hoods and hold banners reading in Bulgarian ‘We are all Pussy Riot’ during a demo in front of the Russia’s embassy in Sofia
Renate Kuenast (left) of the German Greens Party and Markus Loening, German Federal Human Rights Commissioner, join supporters protesting outside the Russian embassy in Berlin
Renate Kuenast (left) of the German Greens Party and Markus Loening, German Federal Human Rights Commissioner, join supporters protesting outside the Russian embassy in Berlin
Protest: A Pussy Riot supporter holds a placard with a portrait of Russian President Vladimir Putin during a rally in Brussels
Protest: A Pussy Riot supporter holds a placard with a portrait of Russian President Vladimir Putin during a rally in Brussels

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2189771/Pussy-Riot-punk-band-members-jailed-2-years-Russian-court-hooliganism-motivated-religious-hatred.html#ixzz23rOltt2h

Related:

The White House on Friday condemned the “disproportionate” two-year prison sentence a Russian judge imposed on members of the punk band Pussy Riot, found guilty of “hooliganism” for an event mocking Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“The United States is disappointed by the verdict, including the disproportionate sentences that were granted,” spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters.

Above: Putin on his lunch break
Related:

Finally Obama Takes A Stand Against Russia’s Putin: Condemns Female Punk Band “Pussy Riot” Sentence

August 17, 2012

Actually: some youngsters here at Peace and freedom mad up this headline. I mean, President Putin of Russia sent bear Bombers to say “Hello” to the United States on the 4th of July and nobody from the White House said a thing. And China has claimed total ownership of The South China Sea, The East China Sea and much of the Sea of Japan. From the White House? Nothing.  Soooo NOW! Now we have a reaction on something really important to President Obama.  The White House Condemns the Sentencing of the Pussy Riot! Holy Snikees! Next

President Obama will probably tell the nation he has never eaten at Chick-fil-A!….. Our Hearts Be Still!!

*******************

By Olivier Knox, Yahoo! News | The Ticket

The White House on Friday condemned the “disproportionate” two-year prison sentence a Russian judge imposed on members of the punk band Pussy Riot, found guilty of “hooliganism” for an event mocking Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“The United States is disappointed by the verdict, including the disproportionate sentences that were granted,” spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters.

“While we understand the group’s behavior was offensive to some, we have serious concerns about the way these young women have been treated by the “Russian judicial system,” Earnest said. He did not use the band’s name.

At the State Department, spokeswoman Victoria Nuland bluntly urged Russian authorities to review this case and ensure that the right to freedom of expression is upheld.”

“The United States is concerned about both the verdict and the disproportionate sentences handed down by a Moscow court in the case against the members of the band Pussy Riot and the negative impact on freedom of expression in Russia,” Nuland said in a written statement. Three members of Pussy Riot were found guilty of  hooliganism and sentenced to two years in jail in connection to an incident earlier this year in which they mocked Putin during a “punk prayer” in a Moscow cathedral.

Judge Marina Syrova announced the verdict from a district court in central Moscow, about two miles from the Christ the Savior Cathedral where the guerrilla group and feminist collective performed its “flash” stunt.

The band members—Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, Maria Alyokhina, 24, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 30—have been in jail since their March 3 arrest, several weeks after the performance. International free-speech advocates have raised a hue and cry over their case.

Related:

MORE COVERAGE FROM YAHOO! NEWS

Above: Members of the female punk band “Pussy Riot” sit in a glass-walled cage after a court hearing in Moscow
President Obama OBJECTS to Putin’s Pussy Riot Decision!!!
Above: The last “diplomatic message” from Russia’s Putin to the United States.
Above: Putin on his lunch break
Above: President Obama on his lunch break…..
China has spent the last four years asserting herself all over Africa, Asia and South America. Above: China has torn apart the key U.S. Allies in the Pacific: Japan and South Korea. The U.S. has said and done little to deter Chinese aggression. Photo: A Protester from China tore a Japanese flag at a rally outside the Japanese consulate in Hong Kong on Thursday. Kin Cheung/The Associated Press
Since President Obama was elected four years ago: China has decided it owns all the South China Sea, The East China Sea, and a lot of the Sea of Japan — and all the oil below. The White House has said and done little if anything…. Map courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.

Family Research Council shooting a posible hate crime

August 16, 2012

FBI officials said Thursday that the shooting of a security guard at the Family Research Council’s D.C. headquarters on Wednesday may fall in the “hate crime/terrorism nexus,” depending on the shooter’s motive.

FRC is a socially conservative Christian advocacy organization that opposes gay marriage and abortion, among its other causes. In an interview on Fox News Thursday, FRC President Tony Perkins said he thought the attack should be classified as “terrorism,” but some other commentators have suggested that the shooting may also qualify as a hate crime, if it can be proven that the attacker was targeting the group’s religious beliefs.

By Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News

Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council, arrives to speak at a press conference. (Mark Wilson/Getty)

Suspected shooter Floyd Lee Corkins II ”has strong opinions with respect to those he believes do not treat homosexuals in a fair manner,” according to his parents, and Corkins is said to have yelled that he did not like FRC’s politics before opening fire. He was also found with a backpack that contained more than a dozen Chick-Fil-a sandwiches, which could be a reference to the chicken chain president’s very public opposition to gay marriage.

Jack Levin, a sociology and criminology professor at Northeastern University who has written books about hate crimes, tells Yahoo News that he thinks it would be hard to argue that Corkins was targeting the group for their religion, rather than for their political beliefs, based on the facts. The federal hate crime statute doesn’t include political beliefs in its list of protected categories.

“Liberalism or conservativism is simply not a protected category under the federal law,” Levin said.

However, the District of Columbia is one of a few localities that includes political beliefs in its hate crime statute, according to an analysis by Yahoo News’ own Chris Wilson. (In Washington, “race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, family responsibility, physical disability, matriculation, or political affiliation” are all in the definition of a bias-related crime.)

It’s possible then that D.C. could charge Corkins with a hate crime, while on the federal level, authorities charge him with domestic terrorism, which is specifically directed at politically motivated crimes. (The U.S. Patriot Act defines terrorism as a dangerous action that is intended to intimidate or coerce a “civilian population,” influence government policy by intimidation or affect a government’s actions by “mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.” Terrorism can be the work of one isolated individual, or a larger network of criminals.)

But the FRC might not necessarily support the local hate crime prosecution tactic. The group opposes all hate crime laws on principle, calling them “Thought Crime laws,” and has singled out the sexual orientation portion of hate crime laws as particularly objectionable.

Joan Rivers tries making a joke out of the Constitution

August 12, 2012

Celebrity author and comic Joan Rivers is demanding justice from Costco, claiming the giant retailer violated her First Amendment rights. So does  Rivers really have a case?

On the surface, the answer would be a firm no. But in every cloud there is a silver lining, and Rivers’ 30-minute temper tantrum at a Costco in California has put the name of the First Amendment back in the news.

In the past few weeks, the First Amendment debate has been over Chick-fil-A and the rights of chairman Dan Cathy to voice his objections to same-sex marriage.

By Scott Bomboy | National Constitution Center

Joan Rivers
Larry Busacca/Getty Images for Tribeca Film Festival

While some people don’t agree with Cathy’s comments, most people understand he has the right, under the First Amendment, to voice an opinion, just as Cathy’s critics have the right to stop buying Chick-fil-A products.

So the controversy over Chick-fil-A prompted dialogue over the First Amendment–and the agreement on the First Amendment, among people who didn’t agree on Chick-fil-A’s stance, lent some civility to the contentious debate over the chicken retailer.

In the case of Costco, Rivers says the retailer is just plain chicken for refusing to carry her latest book.

Costco reportedly balked at the book because it has two obscene words on the back jacket cover of I Hate Everything … Starting With Me.

At a Burbank, California, Costco store, Rivers, 79, handcuffed herself to a shopping cart on August 7 while repeatedly saying Costco was violating her First Amendment rights by not selling her books.

“They have no right; the First Amendment says I can sell my book,” Rivers said at her protest, as several  of her associates shouted “First Amendment!”

Rivers ended her protest talking more about the First Amendment, before police escorted away.

Later on Twitter, Rivers again joked about the First Amendment issue.

“Thank you ALL so much for your support! I embrace my First Amendment Rights to free speech. And my book ‘I Hate Everyone’ sure proves that!” she said on Twitter.

And in an interview with Yahoo! she repeated her stance that her First Amendment concerns were more than a publicity stunt.

In reality, Costco doesn’t really have a legal obligation, under the First Amendment, to sell any product.

The First Amendment guarantees the right of free speech and doesn’t get into the issue of commerce.

Also, Costco is notoriously picky about the products it sells. If you have seen CNBC’s documentary on Costco, there is a long evaluation process for a small number of products sold there.

On a May 2012 conference call, the company’s CFO said Costco currently carries about 3,700 products, a much lower amount than retail competitors.

At last check, Rivers’ book wasn’t ranked in among  top 100 sellers in Amazon’s best seller list. It was listed number 11 in the humor category.

Gene Policinski from the First Amendment Center, in a commentary, says Rivers should be criticized for comparing Costco to Nazi Germany, but not for bringing up the First Amendment.

“The 45 words of the First Amendment apply only to government, no matter how large or small the store is,” said Policinski.

“When only 4% of us can name all five freedoms in the First Amendment, as found in the 2012 State of the First Amendment survey, any bit of education is welcome. At least Rivers named the right amendment.”

Hopefully, Rivers won’t make the argument that her book should be sold based on the taxing power or commerce clause of the Constitution.

****************************

Joan Rivers still hates everything, including the Anti-Defamation League.

The watchdog organization took issue with the outspoken comedienne after she compared Costco to Nazi Germany for refusing to sell her book (I Hate Everything… Starting With Me!) due to foul language. Rivers staged a protest at the discount warehouse’s Burbank location on Tuesday, handcuffing herself to a shopping cart and using a bullhorn to express her discontent.

Read more from The Hollywood Reporter:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/joan-
rivers-nazi-costco-anti-defamation-360905

Sara Palin Unplugged: Mama Grizzly On The Prowl

August 7, 2012
By Diana Reese, The Washington Post

CLEVELAND, Mo—Sarah Palin did not disappoint.

The crowd cheered and applauded repeatedly during her speech here Friday night, from her opening remarks about “mama grizzlies” on the Missouri state flag to her promise to stop at the local Chick-fil-A for a midnight snack.

It was the first time I’d ever seen Palin in person, and it was well worth the 19-mile drive from my suburban Kansas City home to The Berry Patch, a you-pick blueberry farm near Cleveland, Mo., population 665, in rural Cass County.

Not because I’m a fan or even agree with her ideology, but to see what all the fuss has been about.

Palin was in the Kansas City area to campaign for Sarah Steelman, who’s in a tight three-way race in Tuesday’s Republican primary for Missouri’s U.S. Senate seat. The winner will face Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) in November.

The Steelman Surge BBQ and Picnic featured speeches by Steelman and Palin, followed with Kansas City barbecue served up by the two women to a crowd estimated at 500 or more, many of whom waited an hour or longer.

Palin was there to lend some of her magic to Steelman, who shares not only her conservative views but an independence and willingness to buck the political system. (One of Steelman’s goals is to end Congressional pensions, for example.)

A half-dozen or so senatorial candidates have been endorsed by Palin this summer, including last week’s winner in Texas, Ted Cruz.

Somehow, Palin has achieved celebrity status since the 2008 election. How many failed vice presidential candidates and former Alaska governors end up with book deals and reality TV shows? With an estimated net worth of $12 million?

When Palin took to the makeshift stage in the middle of a Missouri farm field, she was dressed more for the part of Hollywood celebrity than serious politician. I know someone’s going to remind me that just last week, I said it was sexist to focus on the wardrobes of women in politics.

But it was hard for me to take Palin seriously dressed as she was.

First, her shoes: Five-inch wedges. Her black capris weren’t quite skin-tight but tight enough, and her t-shirt with its Superman logo (a Steelman campaign shirt emblazoned with “Our freedom. Our fight.”) emphasized her figure. She never once removed her oversized sunglasses.

I’m sorry, but I’d like my minister, my doctor and yes, my politicians, to look and dress for their parts.

Once Palin spoke, I couldn’t help but think she sometimes sounds like a caricature of herself. Perhaps it’s her unique manner of speaking or her overuse of certain phrases.

There were moments during her 15-minute speech that I felt like applauding and there were certainly moments that I groaned.

.

Palin started her speech with a comment about the Missouri’s state flag,which does indeed feature three grizzly bears, representing the strength and bravery of the state’s citizens. Whether any of the grizzly bears is female, however, is open to debate.

But when Palin talked about Steelman, at age 18, working on Ronald Reagan’s campaign in 1976, the former Alaska governor turned to her and said, “You couldn’t have been 18, you must’ve been 2…what a hot mama grizzly you have!”

(Insert major groan here.)

Later, referring again to Reagan’s 1976 campaign, Palin said, “Back when Sarah and I were itty bitty babies.”

I would think a mama grizzly would be proud of her age.

Meriting applause were her references to Steelman’s experience as state treasurer and state senator and her attempts to rein in spending and perks for fellow politicians.

“She’s walkin’ the walk and not just talkin’ the talk,” Palin pointed out. Steelman has vowed to cut the deficit and get a balanced budget amendment passed.

And good advice for considering any candidate: Look at the record, not the rhetoric.

The tea party’s mantra of cutting spending and limiting the power of the federal government struck a chord with the audience, but never did the subject of jobs and job creation (my personal obsession) come up.

Instead, Palin reiterated Steelman’s slogan: “The status quo has got to go.”

She said Steelman was not heading to Washington to get invited to “frou-frou chi-chi D.C. cocktail parties.” Instead, she wants to “save our country’s economy and God-given freedoms” while protecting “the sanctity of human life.”

Palin’s certainly not part of the “in” crowd of Washington; none other than Dick Cheney recently blasted her for not being an appropriate choice for McCain’s running mate in 2008. So far, she’s not been invited to speak at the upcoming Republican National Convention.

But out here, just close enough to Kansas City for the metro’s media outlets to send camera crews and reporters to cover the event, the people loved Palin.

We’ll find out tomorrow if that love has rubbed off on Steelman.

Diana Reese is a freelance journalist in Kansas City. Follow her on Twitter at @dianareese.

Read more from PostPolitics

The Fix: New ad ties Mitt Romney to cancer death

Fact Checker: Harry Reid gets four Pinocchios on Romney’s taxes

Romney’s V.P. list seems to get shorter

Culture and Politics Collide: Chick-fil-A

August 5, 2012

After Chick-fil-A had a “record-setting” day on Wednesday, as thousands lined up to buy chicken sandwiches to show solidarity with the sandwich shop, gay rights groups planned their own protest on Friday: a same-sex “kiss-in” to draw attention to what they say is the company’s bigoted stance toward gays.

The peculiar uproar over Atlanta-based Chick-fil-A has been fueled by politicians, both conservative and liberal. Liberal mayors have denounced the company’s CEO, Dan Cathy, for expressing “antigay” views, while conservative politicians urged Americans to stand up for religious freedom and free speech by patronizing the business. That culminated in “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” on Wednesday, when some of the company’s 1,600 restaurants ran out of chicken after seeing as much as a 200 percent increase in their daily business.

More broadly, how a slab of Southern-style chicken on a fluffy bun became a cultural rallying point is a story that some political scientists say represents a new evolution in the confluence of business, culture, and politics. That story may also, they suggest, shed light on the simmering dynamics around the fight for the US presidency.

RECOMMENDED: Gay rights in America: How states stand on gay marriage and 6 other issues

“This is an event that won’t soon be forgotten on both sides, and it’s kind of a wake-up call for what’s at stake in the November elections for very different groups in the country,” says Merle Black, apolitical scientist at Emory University, in Atlanta. “For one thing, probably everybody who showed up in support for Chick-fil-A will be voting in the fall, and I doubt they’ll be voting for Obama.”

By Patrik Jonsson | Christian Science Monitor – Fri, Aug 3, 2012

People line up at Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day

For the thousands who lined up Wednesday, their motivations ranged widely beyond simple hunger. Some sided ideologically with Mr. Cathy, who told a Baptist newspaper in July that he is “guilty as charged” for supporting traditional marriage between a man and a woman.

But what began as grass-roots anger on the left about Cathy’s views expanded beyond the gay rights issue when Boston Mayor Thomas Menino (D) stepped into the fray, suggesting he would work to keep the company from opening franchises in Boston. (Mr. Menino later walked his statement back.)Chicago Mayor Rahm EmanuelPresident Obama’s former chief of staff, said Chick-fil-A does not represent “Chicago values” and stood behind an effort by Alderman Joe Moreno to keep Chick-fil-A from expanding in the Windy City.

Those stances came under fire as unconstitutional on their merits, given that there’s no evidence Chick-fil-A discriminates against anyone). They also drew the ire of many conservatives, who perceive in Democrats in power a patten of engaging in what Mr. Black calls “old-fashioned bullying” of religion and free enterprise.

“On Wednesday, standing in a queue for fast food was no longer just standing in a queue for fast food – it was standing for values and, ultimately, to support a collective vision for the direction and fate of a nation,” writes columnist Colin Horgan, in the British newspaper the Guardian.

Brand identity has been creeping into politics for awhile, as companies such as Starbucks (gun rights) and Target (public breastfeeding) can attest. Way before that, civil rights-era lunch-counter sit-ins established businesses as political battlegrounds. But to a new degree, the Chick-fil-A protests became for some conservatives a proxy for critiques of the White House’s statements on capitalism, including Mr. Obama’s recent “you didn’t build that” suggestion to small businesses.

Acknowledging that the White House has not weighed in on the Chick-fil-A controversy, Charles Murray, a libertarian political scientist with the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, says “the flap about ‘you didn’t build that’ … contains this un-American assumption where you somehow start with the collective and congratulate the collective and then maybe carve out some space for the individual and what the individual accomplishes. In that way, the Chick-fil-A [backlash] is of a piece with the kind of thing we’ve gotten used to in the last four years – this intrusion of people with political power into people’s right to provide a good or service.”

For liberals, the support for Chick-fil-A and its CEO, who has contributed $5 million to several organizations considered by some to be “antigay,” hints at a simmering intolerance, and even hatred, that remain unaddressed and could be unleashed if Obama loses the presidency.

“I have never felt so alien in my own country as I did today while covering the restaurant’s supporters,” a Florida newspaper reporter wrote on his Facebook page after filing a story.

The kiss-in Friday is intended to confront Cathy’s religious views by highlighting the growing cultural acceptance of gay couples. Perhaps sensing a sensitive political moment, protest sponsors suggested that protesters be respectful and not “lewd” in their actions.

For its part, Chick-fil-A has refrained from making any more political statements about the controversy swirling around its red-and-white sign. “We understand from news reports that Friday may present yet another opportunity for us to serve with genuine hospitality, superior service and great food,” the company said in a statement about the kiss-in protests.

For some on the sidelines, however, the messages swirling around Chick-fil-A’s by-all-accounts-delicious sandwich were too muddled to mean much.

“Through all the din of the controversy, the message being conveyed is no more coherent than a conversation through the microphone on the drive-through line,” former US Rep. Philip English (R)of Pennsylvania told Politico.

RECOMMENDED: Gay rights in America: How states stand on gay marriage and 6 other issues

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

People Swarm into Chick-fil-A On Appreciation Day

August 2, 2012

It used to be that taking a bite of a chicken sandwich just meant you were hungry. Now it has become a symbol of whether you stand for or against same-sex marriage, or – alternately – the right to express your personal views without fear of retaliation.

At Chick-fil-A locations across the country, people voted with their wallets today, coming out to express support for the fast-food chain after CEO Dan Cathy said in an interview that he is a firm backer of traditional marriage.

By John Roberts, Fox News

“I believe what the Bible says (about marriage),” Chauncy Fields told us after wolfing down a breakfast of chicken and biscuits.  “So I came out here to support Chick-fil-A and the movement.”

Chris Johnson sees a double standard. “He (Dan Cathy) said the exact same thing that President Obama said,” Johnson told Fox News — referring to the president’s past opposition to gay marriage – “And he gets negativity, and Obama gets positivity.”

People line up at Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day

Read more:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/01/chick-fil-apprec
iation-day-brings-out-supporters-more-protestors/#ixzz22N4OBfyN

Chick-fil-A supporters plan appreciation day

August 1, 2012

ATLANTA (AP) — Supporters of Chick-fil-A are planning to eat at restaurants in the chicken chain as the company continues to be criticized for an executive’s comments about gay marriage.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a Baptist minister, declared Wednesday national “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day.”

Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy told the Baptist Press last month that the Atlanta-based company was “guilty as charged” for backing “the biblical definition of a family.” That unleashed a torrent of criticism from gay rights groups and others, who have called for boycotts and efforts to block the chain from opening new stores.

Opponents of the company’s stance are planning “Kiss Mor Chiks” for Friday, when they are encouraging people of the same sex to show up at Chick-fil-A restaurants around the country and kiss each other.

Related:

Chick-fil-A braces for protests, same-sex ‘kiss-in’ — Business Kiss of Death?

August 1, 2012

The still-simmering controversy sparked by the Chick-fil-A president’s public comments against same-sex marriage is set to reignite this week, as more than 500,000 people say they will join former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee’s “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” on Wednesday by “simply showing up and eating” at one of the company’s 1,600 restaurants, while protesters backed by gay and lesbian groups plan to participate in a same-sex “kiss-in” on Friday at the same stores.

Chick-fil-A, founded in 1946, has a long history of unapologetic social conservatism. But the most recent clash between the $4 billion fast-food chain and progressive groups began in June, when Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy said that those who support gay marriage are “inviting God’s judgment on our nation.”

“We shake our fist at Him and say, ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage,’” Cathy said in a radio interview. “I pray God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we have the audacity to define what marriage is about.” Then, in an interview published by the Baptist Press, Cathy doubled down on his stance against same-sex unions.

“Guilty as charged,” Cathy said. “We are very much supportive of the family—the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that.”

[Related: Chick-fil-A president slams gay marriage]

The backlash from supporters of same-sex marriage quickly followed. “Hate to think what they do to the gay chickens!” actor Ed Helms tweeted on July 18. “Lost a loyal fan.”

Read the rest:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/chick-fil-kiss-protests-
boycott-same-sex-173038515–finance.html

Chick-fil-A Parody Offers to Swap ‘Homosexuality for Chicken Sandwich’

July 30, 2012

As if Chick-fil-A needed another public relations headache, it’s become the target of a new paordy site created in protest of company president and COO Dan Cathy’s opposition to gay marriage.

[More from Mashable: Cybersecurity Bill Inches Closer to Passing]

The Chick-fil-A Foundation is a website cleverly designed to mimic the real Chick-fil-A site, except it’s full of satirical content that defends Cathy’s comments and calls on gay people to renounce their homosexuality.

Visitors are even greeted with a coupon for an unorthodox deal — gay people are asked to “trade their homosexuality” for a free Original Chicken Sandwich. The faux coupon “only applies to persons currently choosing to be gay” who “renounce homosexuality,” and is only good for one sandwich “per saved person.”

[More from Mashable: New Tool Connects Facebook Friends With Political Campaigns]

1 of 500 photos
Chick-fil-A Parody Offers to Swap 'Homosexuality for Chicken Sandwich'

The “Foundation’s” staff includes “John,” “Robert” and “Harvey the Cow” — likely a reference toHarvey Milk, the first openly gay man to be elected to public office in California (the joke has numerous layers, as the real Chick-fil-A uses cows in its advertising campaigns).

A satirical letter posted by “Dan Cathy” says, “If a man married to a man or a woman married to a woman is your definition of a family and you are looking for a place to grab a quick bite to eat, I would encourage you to look elsewhere because that is not Chick-fil-A’s definition.”

There’s also a Twitter account, @CFAcares, tied into the satirical campaign. It’s mostly been tweeting at politicians who oppose gay rights including Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann, whose husband has been accused of offering “gay therapy” services.

Read the rest:

http://news.yahoo.com/chick-fil-parody-offers-swap-
homosexuality-chicken-sandwich-112016924.html


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 307 other followers