Vietnamese propaganda officials have admitted deploying people to engage in online discussions and post comments supporting the Communist Party’s policies.
The party has also confirmed that it operates a network of nearly 1,000 “public opinion shapers”.
They are assigned with the task of spreading the party line.
The tactic is similar to China’s model of internet moderators who aim to control news and manipulate opinion.
‘Political opportunists’Hanoi Propaganda and Education Department head Ho Quang Loi said that the authorities had hired hundreds of so-called “internet polemists” in the fight against “online hostile forces”.
While the exact number of these activists is unknown, Mr Loi revealed that his organisation is running at least 400 online accounts and 20 microblogs.
Regular visitors on popular social media networks in Vietnam such as Facebook have long noticed the existence of a number of pro-regime bloggers, who frequently post comments and articles supportive of the Communist Party.
The bloggers also take part in online discussions, where they fiercely attack anybody who they see as critical of the regime.
On a recent BBC Vietnamese Facebook wall – linked to a story about measures to clamp down on dissent – one such blogger asked why it was that the US “gave themselves the right to criticise other nations on human rights”.
“They should have a look at their own record!” the blogger stated.

Another post criticises pro-democracy campaigners.
“The so-called democracy activists and intellectuals are becoming more and more ridiculous. They have shown their true colour as political opportunists. Their despicability has no bounds,” it says.
Mr Loi said such bloggers helped a great deal in stopping negative rumours and had blocked online calls for mass gatherings in the city.
Vietnam’s capital saw at least dozen public protests in 2011, but the number was greatly reduced last year.
The authorities also employ a force of 900 “public opinion shapers” who help talk up government policies and promote the party line across the country.
It is not clear whether these operatives, and the bloggers, are on official payrolls.
But they are being praised by officials as a sophisticated and effective tool in controlling public opinion.
*************************
Related:
Criminally Corrupt Vietnam Court Sentences Activists, Denies Human Rights
.
Human Rights Watch Speaks Out On Vietnam

Defendants in court Photo: Nguyen Van Nhat/REUTERS
Here is a list of Vietnamese found guilty this week of “crimes against the Government of Vietnam” along with their prison terms:
1. Ho Duc Hoa (13 years in prison, 5 years house arrest)
2. Dang Xuan Dieu (13 years in prison, 5 years house arrest)
3. Paulus Le Son (13 years in prison, 5 years house arrest)
4. Nguyen Van Duyet (6 years in prison, 4 years house arrest)
5. Nguyen Van Oai (3 years in prison, 2 years house arrest)
6. Ho Van Oanh (3 years in prison, 2 years house arrest)
7. Nguyen Dinh Cuong (4 years in prison, 3 years house arrest)
8. Nguyen Xuan Anh (5 years in prison, 3 years house arrest)
9. Thai Van Dung (5 years in prison, 3 years house arrest)
10. Tran Minh Nhat (4 years in prison, 3 years house arrest)
11. Nong Hung Anh (5 years in prison, 3 years house arrest)
12. Nguyen Dang Vinh Phuc (probation)
13. Nguyen Dang Minh Man (9 years in prison, 3 years house arrest)
14. Dang Ngoc Minh (3 years in prison, 2 years house arrest)
*************************************
Reuters Called Law Used To Jail Vietnamese Activists “Draconian”
Jan 9 (Reuters) – Thirteen political activists were found
guilty of anti-state crimes in Vietnam on Wednesday and
sentenced to prison, a ruling condemned by rights activists who
saw it as part of a crackdown on dissidents in the communist
country.
Relatives of the defendants and several Catholic blogs said
the 13, including bloggers and members of a Catholic church,
were sentenced to terms ranging from three to 13 years. Another
accused received a suspended sentence.
Court officials declined to provide details of the verdict,
which was read out after a two-day hearing during which large
numbers of police were deployed around the courthouse.
The court in Vinh, 300 km (190 miles) south of Hanoi, found
them guilty of “carrying out activities aimed at overthrowing
the people’s administration”, a charge under Article 79 of the
penal code that can carry the death penalty.
“Article 79 is a very draconian charge,” said Phil
Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “There is
nothing to indicate the defendants intended to overthrow the
government.”
“This trial is in the middle of a deepening crackdown that’s
been gradually picking up speed in the past year, year and a
half. They’re mowing down the ranks of activists in Vietnam,” he
said.
In a statement, the U.S. embassy in Hanoi said it was
“deeply troubled” by reports of the convictions.
“The government’s treatment of these individuals appears to
be inconsistent with Vietnam’s obligations under the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as well as
the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
relating to freedom of expression and due process,” it said,
calling for all prisoners of conscience to be freed.
The 14 defendants were arrested between August and December
2011 and held for more than a year before standing trial.
Rights groups say they are peaceful protesters and advocates
of workers rights and democracy, plus supporters of other
imprisoned activists.
Government officials were not available for comment.
FEAR OF PROTESTS
Eleven of the defendants were identified in an official
indictment as members of Viet Tan, an outlawed pro-democracy
group based in the United States. The activities deemed
subversive included attending a digital security workshop in
Thailand.
“People in Vietnam have the right to participate in the
political affairs of the country. They have the basic right of
belonging to any political organisation they choose,” Duy Hoang,
a spokesman for Viet Tan, told Reuters.
“No one is accused of doing anything that is actually a
‘wrong’ activity. They are being persecuted,” he said.
Hoang declined to say whether any of the defendants were
members of the party.
Dang Ngoc Minh and her daughter Nguyen Dang Minh Man were
accused of painting the slogan “HS.TS.VN” on a school. According
to the defendants, that meant “Hoang Sa, Truong Sa, Viet Nam” –
or “the Paracel and Spratly Islands belong to Vietnam”.
Those islands are also claimed by China in a territorial
dispute that flared up anew in 2012. The Vietnamese government
agrees with the slogan, that the islands belong to Vietnam.
“Vietnamese authorities haven’t been able to say why this is
bad,” Robertson said of the slogan.
“Part of the reason the government cracked down on protests
related to policies on China is that it fears such protests will
get out of control and morph into something else.”
A crackdown could have international trade repercussions.
“There’s opposition in the U.S. to extending economic
benefits to a country engaged in activity so antithetical to its
values,” said Allen Weiner, a senior lecturer in international
law at Stanford Law School.
“The government of Vietnam is conducting a legal process
which is completely non-transparent. The courts are being used
as an instrument of state repression rather than honestly
adjudicating guilt or innocence,” he said.
(Reporting by Paul Carsten in Bangkok; Editing by Alan Raybould
and Robert Birsel)