South China Sea ruling adds to fears that the sea life will be destroyed — Philippines President Duterte Has Already Said Philippines Won’t Honour UN Climate Deal

Court decision escalates tensions in ecologically sensitive region, but may also push nations to cooperate.

By David Cyranoski

20 July 2016

An international tribunal has ruled against China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea — and ecologists are worried. They warn that the decision, which China has vowed to ignore, could escalate tensions between China and its neighbours, leading to increased competition for fish and a subsequent collapse in stocks.

“Now catastrophe looks much closer than before,” says John McManus, a marine ecologist at the University of Miami in Florida. “The Hague decision stirred the pot.”

Dr. John McManus, professor of Marine Biology and Fisheries at the University of Miami’s Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science

But McManus and others also note that the ruling, by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, may nudge China to cooperate more with regional rivals on scientific and environmental issues.

The Philippines brought the case in 2013 following China’s occupation of a reef, called Scarborough Shoal, that both countries claim. On 12 July, the court upheld Philippine allegations that China had unlawfully restricted access to its fisherman there. And it rebuked China for its broader territorial claims within the ‘nine-dash line’ that envelops most of the South China Sea (see‘Disputed waters’).

China argues that certain geological fixtures in the sea are islands that belong to its sovereign land and that the waters that surround them are within its ‘exclusive economic zone’. The court found that the fixtures are merely rocks or “low-tide elevations”.

Giant Clams are disappearing from the South China Sea

The tribunal also said that China had violated the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by constructing artificial islands that damaged coral reefs, and by failing to stop its fishers from snatching protected species.

The judgement is legally binding, but China, which views the South China Sea as increasingly important strategically, looks likely to ignore it. “China neither accepts nor recognizes it,” says a statement from the foreign affairs ministry. The region contains more than 1 billion tonnes of oil reserves and is an important nexus connecting the Pacific and Indian oceans. “No one will force China from those islands if they don’t want to go,” says Tim Johnston, Asia program director for the Brussels-based International Crisis Group. Days after the ruling, China cordoned off a swathe of the area for military exercises.

Military escalation could follow. For instance, the tribunal found that Mischief Reef is within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone but China has built a military base there, and, since the ruling, landed an aircraft there.

CSIS AMTI/DigitalGlobe

China has built on Mischief Reef in the South China Sea.

Ecologists will be watching out for an escalation in fishing, in particular at the Scarborough Shoal. Fish densities and catch rates in the South China Sea have plummeted in past decades. McManus’s research suggests that the reef sits at the centre of a crucial region from which many coastal fishing stocks are replenished. He fears that the ruling — which found that China and the Philippines share fishing rights there — will lead both to increase their fishing activity. “One will try to get there before the other one,” says McManus. “When we have a present fisheries crisis and a looming fisheries catastrophe, you shouldn’t go to one of the most important places for fisheries and destroy it.” Such a rush could affect hundreds of species, he says, and permanently reduce the numbers of some, including sea turtles, sharks and giant clams.

Another problem for conservationists is the destruction of coral reefs. McManus estimates that 162 square kilometres of reef has been destroyed, almost all of it by the Chinese in the past few decades. His calculations, which he presented at the South China Sea Conference on 12 July, suggest that Chinese cutter boats that hunt endangered giant clams account for 104 km2 of the damage, with 55 km2 a result of island building by dredging sediment from the ocean floor and dumping it on the reefs.

A statement by China’s ministry of foreign affairs says that island building is carried out “based on thorough studies and scientific proof” and that “the impact on the ecological system of coral reefs is limited”. But scientists have long said that the island building has to stop. Kwang-Tsao Shao, a marine-biodiversity expert at Taiwan’s Academia Sinica in Taipei, says that at meetings that include his mainland peers, there is consensus from ecologists on both sides of the strait that the region should be set aside as a marine protected area.

Scientists in the region do already collaborate: Zhifei Liu at Tongji University in Shanghai, China, leads a UNESCO research project which brings together scientists from China, the Philippines and other countries to study how sediment is deposited and transported in the South China Sea. Liu says that this and other China-funded projects will be unaffected by the ruling, although he worries that Philippine collaborators might now drop out.

But scientific interest and environmental objectives in the area could strengthen diplomacy, by giving adversaries a reason to sit down and iron out priorities of mutual interest. The tribunal ruling may be what is needed to spark such dialogue, says Johnston. China — although bullish in its responses so far and unlikely to give up its claims — will want to at least look as though it is acting fairly and for the common good. “We are hoping this may tip the balance and persuade China that constructive negotiation is the way forward,” he says.

Since the 1990s, McManus has advocated for a jointly run marine ‘peace park’ in the region. “It’s the only way to avert a fisheries collapse. It will have a good effect on efforts to avert military action,” he says. The tribunal decision makes him slightly more optimistic. He now gives the park a 1 in 10 chance of happening rather than 1 in 100. “If China can just sit there thinking ‘this is all ours’, we won’t get anywhere,” he says.


 (Has links to many related conservation and environmental articles)


Philippines won’t honour UN climate deal, says president

 ‘You are trying to stifle us … you who have reached your peak and spewed a lot of emissions,’ said president Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines. Photograph: Toto Lozano / Handout/EPA

Duterte says Paris climate pact seeks to dictate to developing countries and limit economic growth, reports Climate Home

The Philippines will not honour commitments it made under the Paris climate change deal, president Rodrigo Duterte has said in a speech.

“You are trying to stifle us,” Duterte said on Monday in widely reported comments. “That’s stupid, I will not honour that. You signed … That was not my signature.”

The UN pact, agreed by 195 countries including the Philippines last December, aims to limit warming to below 2C (36F) and strive to keep temperatures at 1.5Cabove pre-industrial levels.

The deal comes into force when 55 countries covering 55% of global emissions formally join. The Philippines accounts for less than 1% of the world’s emissions, and has not ratified the deal.

Read the rest:


The historic Paris climate deal seeks to limit global warming “well below” two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. TOTO LOZANO/PPD
MANILA, Philippines — A historic climate agreement pushed by the previous administration will not be honored by President Rodrigo Duterte, who believes the deal is blocking the progress of developing countries like the Philippines.
Duterte claimed that industrialized countries are “dictating the destiny” of developing ones by requiring them to cut carbon emissions.
“We have not reached the age of industrialization. We are going into it. But you are trying to (cite) agreement that will impose limitations on us. We maintain the present emission. That’s stupid,” Duterte said during the sendoff of the Philippine delegation to the Rio Olympics on Monday in Malacañan Palace.
“I will not honor that,” he added.
Last April, more than 150 countries signed the historic Paris climate deal that seeks to limit global warming “well below” two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. World leaders have also promised to continue efforts to limit temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
The signatories are also required to step up measures that will stop the increase in greenhouse gas emissions.
The Philippines under then President Benigno Aquino III committed to reduce carbon emissions by 70 percent by 2030 even if it is not a major source of greenhouse gases. The Paris agreement, however, does not say what will happen to countries that will fail to meet their emission reduction goals.
The agreement was crafted during the 21st Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change held in France last December. During the conference, Aquino said the survival of island nations depends on the international community’s commitment to act on climate change and to reduce greenhouse emissions.
Duterte said he has expressed his refusal to honor the Paris agreement in a conversation with an ambassador whom he did not name.
When the ambassador reminded him that the Philippines signed the Paris deal, Duterte said: “That was not my signature. Somebody else’s, not mine.”
“We’ll make a new one or we do not honor (it) at all,” he added.
Duterte, who vowed to honor international agreements during his inauguration, noted that developed countries harmed the environment while they were undergoing industrialization.
“Now that we are about to develop, you (developed countries) will set limits,” the president said.
“Kalokohan yan (That’s absurd). So that is how very competitive and that is how very constricted our lives now. It’s being controlled by the world. It’s being imposed upon us by the industrialized countries. They think that they can dictate the destiny of the rest of the nation,” he added.
Last May, Duterte said industrialized nations should help developing ones to comply with the Paris agreement by providing financial assistance.
“I don’t have (a) problem with that. I will cooperate with whatever it takes to cut emission but look at history,” Duterte said in a press briefing.
“They (developed nations) were enjoying the booming (economy) and flooding the air with contaminants. Now that they are rich because of coal and industrialization, we are being asked to cut emission and limit our activities,” he added.
“If you have qualms, pay us or give us time to catch up.”
Frequent natural calamities have been blamed on climate change, which in turn, has been attributed on greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activities.
Some sectors, however, doubt the connection between emissions and climate change and scored what they described as “climate alarmism” that benefits the interests of green technology and renewable energy investors.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to “South China Sea ruling adds to fears that the sea life will be destroyed — Philippines President Duterte Has Already Said Philippines Won’t Honour UN Climate Deal”

  1. daveyone1 Says:

    Reblogged this on World Peace Forum.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: