Barack Obama Was Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize Seven Years Ago — Today Barack Obama the “Philosopher-President” and Nobelist has become a bad memory among Europeans

Europe got the kind of transnational American president it wanted. What it didn’t get was peace and security.

President Barack Obama speaks at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo, Dec. 10, 2009.
President Barack Obama speaks at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo, Dec. 10, 2009. PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Oct. 6, 2016 7:16 p.m. ET

Seven years ago this week the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize to Barack Obama. The decision was greeted with ridicule in the U.S., and it unsettled even supporters of the president, who hadn’t finished his first year in office. Still Mr. Obama flew to Oslo and delivered one of his trademark speeches. The philosopher-president was the toast of Europe.

Mr. Obama today almost never mentions the prize, and the Nobel Committee’s former secretary has expressed regret over the choice. Barack Obama the Nobelist is a bad memory among Europeans, who face more pressing concerns, chief among them a Syrian civil war that has flooded the Continent with more than a million refugees.

Yet this Nobel indigestion is unfair to Mr. Obama. On its own terms his prize has been a resounding success. Seven years later the president has achieved the future-tense victories first celebrated in Oslo.

The committee that awarded the prize hoped for an America that would no longer play the hegemon. The Norwegians wanted a U.S. president who would “strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples,” as the Nobel citation put it. A leader who would emphasize “the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play,” whose decisions would track the “attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.”

This was the heyday of transnationalism, the philosophy that says all states—strong or weak, free or unfree—must submit to “norms” drawn up by law professors and global organizations such as the U.N. and European Union. The transnationalist view can’t tolerate an exceptional nation that imposes its will on others, even with the best intentions.


People walk on the rubble of damaged buildings in the rebel held area of al-Kalaseh in Aleppo on 29 September Reuters

Mr. Obama was (and remains) a committed transnationalist, and he staffed his foreign-policy team with like-minded thinkers such as the journalist Samantha Power, the Yale Law School dean Harold Koh and the Princeton scholar Anne-Marie Slaughter. At his Nobel lecture in Oslo, Mr. Obama declared: “I am convinced that adhering to standards, international standards, strengthens those who do, and isolates and weakens those who don’t.”

Both Hillary Clinton and John Kerry delivered miserably poor performances as U.S. Secretaries of State in the Obama Administration…

The real-world results are a different matter. They are on display in Aleppo, where the Bashar Assad regime and its Russian and Iranian patrons are close to bringing to heel Syria’s last non-Islamic State opposition stronghold. Syrian forces shell houses and drop shrapnel-packed barrels on what remains of the city’s civilian buildings. Vladimir Putin’s pilots stalk the skies, setting women and children alight with incendiary ordnance.

In Oslo in 2009, Mr. Obama said of situations like the one unfolding in Syria: “Inaction tears at our conscience and can lead to more costly intervention later.” How costly?

During Tuesday’s vice-presidential debate, Republican Gov. Mike Pence spoke of creating no-fly zones to protect civilians while Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine floated a “humanitarian zone” in Aleppo. The trouble is that the Kremlin this week deployed the SA-23 Gladiator anti-air system to Syria for the first time. The SA-23 can take down aircraft as well as missiles. It is an insurance policy for the Assad regime that will raise the stakes in any future U.S. military action.

With his endless patience for rogues, in other words, Mr. Obama has tied the hands of his successor. Set aside the human misery in Syria. Set aside, too, the destabilizing effects of millions of refugees on Syria’s neighboring states and Europe. The expansion of Russian and Iranian influence in the Middle East represents a long-term strategic setback for the West.

Mr. Putin’s pilots are also increasingly menacing European homelands, with the French Defense Ministry revealing Wednesday that Russian military aircraft last month skirted the airspaces of France, Norway, Spain and the U.K., forcing all four countries to scramble jets. This, too, is the fruit of the humbler Washington the Europeans wished for in 2009.

Tu-160 Blackjack bombers flying toward northern Scotland on the morning of September 22.

Two Russian Tu-160 Blackjack bombers flew toward Scotland on the morning of September 22 —  skirted Scotland and Ireland as they flew from the Arctic to the Bay of Biscay in a dhow of military force and gall that should be humiliating to the U.S., NATO and all of Europe. CREDIT: AFP/GETTY IMAGES

One question that lingers seven years later: What did the Nobel Committee imagine would follow when America assumed an unexceptional role on the world stage?  In the U.S., some thought American retrenchment might spur Europeans to finally take responsibility for securing the Continent’s peripheries. This wasn’t an unreasonable assumption, but it proved wrong. Europeans remain as parochial as ever.

The Nobel Committee, and the intellectual class whose preferences it reflected, had loftier ideas. In 2009 they thought that, without U.S. “unilateralism,” the world could settle enmity and evil the same way the EU resolves disputes over agricultural subsidies. This was when EU boosters like the historian Tony Judt still wrote of the 21st century as a European century—when the rest of the world would embrace the European way of dialogue.

Seven years later the Europeans can barely solve their subsidy disputes, and the Continent has had quite enough of the philosopher-president.

Mr. Ahmari is a Journal editorial writer based in London.


Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iran’s Roiuhani

Obama Legacy Includes The Anti-U.S. Unity Between Russia, China and Iran

China and Russia held joint military exercises in the Pacific Ocean in 2014 and then in the South China Sea in September 2016.


Secretary of State John Kerry (right,) with his man-crush Iranian diplomat Mohammad Javad Zarif. Photo by Getty Images

John Kerry and Sergey Lavrov in 2013. AP photo

At this time last year, U.S. Secretary of State john Kerry was still in love with diplomacy in general and Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov particular. Kerry did not yet realize that he was playing poker with the mass murders of Moscow. He realized too late — and after too many senseless deaths in Syria. Photo: John Kerry and Sergey V. Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, on Sunday Sept. 27, 2015. Credit Dominick Reuter, Agence France-Presse, Getty Image

Those were the days…


Peace and Freedom Note: During the last ceasefire, a humanitarian aid truck convoy was bombed and destroyed. The U.S. blamed Russia and its Syrian allies. But Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov rejected those claims, which finally sapped all the misplaced trust U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry had for Mr. Lavrov….

Syria — Destroyed aid trucks stand near the rebel-held town of Urum al-Kubra. September 20, 2016. The US, UK and France said Russia bombed the humanitarian aid convoy. Russia denied the charge. Reuters

“All we could see was a child’s feet.” — Members of the Syrian Civil Defense group recovered a body after airstrikes on Saturday in the contested city of Aleppo. More than 90 people died on Friday, and more than 100 on Saturday.Credit Syrian Civil Defense White Helmets, via Associated Press.

Kerry and Lavrov pose for a photo at the United Nations in Manhattan, New York, on Sept 23, 2016. PHOTO by REUTERS


A Syrian man stands in the rubble of destroyed buildings following an airstrike in Aleppo on Sunday.
A Syrian man stands in the rubble of destroyed buildings following an airstrike in Aleppo on Sunday. PHOTO:AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

 (and Russia)

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gives Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov her “reset button.” Russia apparently decided to reset to its old Soviet Union and Cold War ways as Mr. Putin took over Crimea, started an intense surrogate military insurgency in eastern Ukraine, and put combat forces into Syria. Putin also ramped up bomber patrols over NATO to a level not seen since the Cold War.

While Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton began what was called the “U.S. pivot to Asia.” In this photo, Hillary Clinton talks with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi. on September 5, 2012. Today Hillary Clinton is running to become the next President of the United States and China’s former Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi has been promoted to the number three leadership within the Chinese Communist Party. China seems to be in control of most of the South China Sea and is pressuring all U.S. allies from Japan to Australia to Singapore to ally themselves with China or face consequences. In 2012, Hillary Clinton was a big advocate of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). After Donald trump said the TPP was not a good deal for American workers, Hillary Clinton became against the TPP.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Barack Obama Was Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize Seven Years Ago — Today Barack Obama the “Philosopher-President” and Nobelist has become a bad memory among Europeans”

  1. suibne Says:

    he is a traitor. ….and americans have been fed the mythical version of paranoid delusions and conspiracies for so long they laugh at the real thing right under their noses…..they are looking at fakes and liars who commit crimes right in front of them and they turn the other way. For the first time in history, Americans will choose between a Criminal and a legitimate candidate. she is a liar, a traitor, a criminal, an accessory to murder, an enabler of her husband’s continued abuse of women and
    now, one of the walking dead. If you vote for her you are as bad as she is. This election will determine the moral, spiritual, psychological, and emotional fate of our country..
    let history show that no matter what real people thought or feared or became angry about, it didn’t matter because the Information Midas, with his cronies, simply erased them.

  2. daveyone1 Says:

    Reblogged this on World Peace Forum.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: