By Emily Meierding
This piece was originally published in New America’s digital magazine, The Weekly Wonk. Sign up to get it delivered to your inbox each Thursday here, and follow @New Americaon Twitter.
A year ago this month, China moved its oil drilling rig, the HD-981, into waters around the Paracel Islands. China’s exploratory drilling provoked a confrontation with Vietnam, which also claims the area. Both countries deployed coast guard vessels and fishing fleets to the drilling site. Ships collided and turned water cannons on each other, sinking a fishing boat. In Vietnam, the incident sparked popular protests; over 20 people were killed.
A Chinese Coast Guard vessel watches over China’s oil rig 981, near Vietnam, in the south China Sea, may 2014.
The rig withdrew in July, after two months of drilling. But it left an unresolved question in its wake: is competition over the South China Sea’s oil and natural gas resources a threat to regional security? This question resonates across the region, as the Paracel Islands are not the only area where hydrocarbon exploration could lead to clashes. In addition to its disputes with Vietnam, China is also involved in disagreements over resource authority with Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Could these countries’ attempts to exploit oil and gas spiral into outright conflict?
The answer, happily, is probably not. The risk of regional “resource wars” has been overstated. Sure, hydrocarbon competition can inspire international spats, but as the HD-981 incident demonstrated, governments are quick to contain them.
When it comes to maritime disputes, islands, not oil, are the greater threat to international stability. Why? Because resources can be shared but islands cannot. In a winner-takes-all environment, leaders have little choice but to dig in their heels. If one country obtains sovereign control over contested territory, the other loses it. But through joint development, resources can be shared.
Over the last few decades, this difference has been particularly evident in the East China Sea. There, Japan and China are contesting control over a group of islands—known as the Senkakus in Japanese and Diaoyus in Chinese—along with oil and natural gas fields, over 100 nautical miles to the northeast of those islands. The dispute over the islands has generated intense hostility between the two countries. The struggle over oil and gas fields, by contrast, has inspired constructive dialogue.
The East China Sea islands claimed by both Japan and China — called Senkakus in Japanese and Diaoyus in Chinese.
That path to restraint, admittedly, hasn’t always been linear. Chinese oil companies began operating in the East China Sea in the late 1970s, where they made their first discovery, the Pinghu field, about a decade later. Pinghu’s development was uncontroversial; the field is almost forty miles west of where Japan draws its international boundary. In the late 1990s, Japan even co-financed the construction of pipelines from Pinghu to the Chinese mainland.
But friction increased as China’s search for hydrocarbons moved closer to the border. In 2003, oil companies set up a production platform above the Chunxiao gas field, one mile from the maritime boundary. Japanese authorities demanded access to the field’s geological data to ensure that China wasn’t siphoning off Japanese reserves. When the companies refused, Japan launched its own exploration program. A seismic survey ship was deployed to the border zone in July 2004. Beijing responded by sending in its navy. Surveillance ships harassed the survey vessel and, in November, a Chinese submarine was spotted in Japanese waters. Two months later, two Chinese destroyers moved into the contested area.
Yet, Japanese and Chinese authorities managed to contain the dispute. In October 2004, the countries launched a series of bilateral talks on the East China Sea issue. Four years of negotiations eventually produced an agreement to exploit hydrocarbon resources cooperatively in the border zone.
The agreement has not led to significant resource cooperation, but China and Japan have avoided further confrontations around the fields. This outcome stands in stark contrast to the dispute over the islands, which continues to provoke tensions, as yet unaddressed by bilateral agreements.
The Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute also emerged in the 1970s, when China started challenging Japan’s authority over the islands. It has gone through periods of escalation, as activists from both countries have attempted to land on the uninhabited islands to reinforce their governments’ territorial claims. In 1978 and 1996, Japanese nationalists landed on the islands and erected lighthouses, prompting diplomatic protests from Beijing and deployments of Chinese fishing boats. Activists from Taiwan and Hong Kong attempted their own landings, some of which succeeded, in spite of resistance from Japan’s Coast Guard. In 2004, activists from mainland China reached the islands for the first time.
These incidents did not spiral into militarized clashes. However, they provoked intense hostility and made the islands a flashpoint for nationalist sentiment on both sides. The populations of both countries were primed for further conflict—such as in 2012, when the Japanese government acquired three of the islands from private owners. In China, the nationalization was met with major anti-Japan protests. Beijing also retaliated by increasing its military presence in the area. Violations of Japan’s territorial waters skyrocketed from almost none to over seventeen per month over the next year. In November 2013, China declared an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) that included the islands.
In the last 18 months, violations have declined, but Japan is still reporting an average of eight per month. Japanese and Chinese officials have also made little progress towards resolving the island dispute. Last November, the countries jointly issued a four-point consensus, aimed at improving bilateral relations. One of the points addressed the Senkakus/Diaoyus, observing that China and Japan had “different views” of the situation, but would attempt to prevent it from escalating. Yet, Japan still refuses to acknowledge the existence of a dispute and neither country has offered concrete proposals for resolving it. Relations between Xi and Abe may be thawing, but a cooperative island agreement is a very long way off.
Chinese and Japanese officials are constrained by their countries’ shared history. The islands issue has acquired enormous symbolic significance in both countries, so attempts to reach a compromise settlement will provoke intense domestic opposition. Consequently, island disputes are likely to remain a thorn in government’s’ sides, persistently at risk of escalation.
Countries have many incentives to compete for authority in the East China Sea and South China Sea, including islands, oil and natural gas, fisheries, sea lanes of communication, and national pride. However, when it comes to inspiring conflict, not all causes are created equal. Hydrocarbon resources, alone, are not a significant threat to regional stability.
Emily Meierding is a Visiting Fellow at the Center for International Environmental Studies (CIES) at the Graduate Institute, Geneva.
South China Sea: U.S. Must Deny China’s “Nine Dash Line” Claim of Ownership of the Sea
South China Sea: Filipino, Vietnamese Fisherfolk Complain About China’s Intrusion, Rape and Pillaging of Marine Life, Coral
Obama administration on the horns of a dilemma over Chinese government’s claims of expanded territorial sovereignty
Australia must choose between Chinese cash and loyalty to the US as SE Asia tensions rise
Australia opposes any military base on artificial islands in the South China Sea: Defence Minister Kevin Andrews
Vietnam Unhappy With China’s Abuse of Its Rights, Fishermen
China, the Maritime Silk Road and Creating A New Global Order
Cam Ranh Bay: Vietnam’s ace in the hole against China
China Warns US Against Sending Ships, Aircraft to South China Sea
China’s Sea Activities Have Worried Neighbors, Fueled An Arms Race (Contains links to several related articles)
Composite photo shows a US Navy P8-A Poseidon surveillance aircraft which was asked to leave the area by the Chinese navy as it approached contested islands in the South China Sea. Photo also shows construction on Fiery Cross Reef, from where the warning could have been issued.
China Expanding Amphibious Warfare Capability
Chinese amphibious ship Changbai Shan near James Shoal, an area also claimed by Malaysia, January 26, 2014 Photo by AP
US to press on with surveillance flights amid tensions in the South China Sea
U.S. publicly challenges China’s moves in disputed islands
Asia has an arms race in submarines
One of Vietnam’s Kilo-class submarines
China’s massive land reclamation does not give it territorial rights — U.S. tells China
China reaffirms territorial claims in South China Sea
Vietnam Lawmakers Urge National Assembly To Condemn China’s “Illegitimate Activities” At Sea
China Escalates South China Sea Row as China’s Navy Warns US Surveillance Plane To “Go Away”
A handout picture released by the Philippine Navy Public Affairs Office shows the arrival of the Japanese navy (back) at Manila South harbor, Philippines on May 9, 2015.
Philippines, Japan Hold Naval Drills in South China Sea
While Nobody Was Looking, China Built A Chain of Fortified Island Military Bases in the South China Sea — Just As They Said They Would
South China Sea: China “Warns Away” Routine U.S. Maritime Surveillance Aircraft Mission — “Absolutely” a risk of the U.S. and China going to war
China’s air force flies over Miyako Strait near Japanese island for the first time
China navy warns U.S. spy plane in disputed South China Sea
Vietnamese Photographer Gives Us A Look At China’s South China Sea Construction
South China Sea: U.S. again says China’s island building is undermining regional freedom and stability
China’s War against International Law in the South China Sea
Taiwan seeks to participate in South China Sea dialogue
Chinese ships illegally fishing off the coast of Africa, Greenpeace says
Philippines Accuses China of Turning Water Cannon on Its Fishing Boats
Diplomacy Alone Won’t Stop the Chinese from Asserting Sovereignty over the South China Sea
Viet Nam Fisheries Society Condemns China’s New Ban on Fishing
South China Sea: Vietnam Asks: “By What Authority Does China Tell Us We Cannot Fish?”
Diplomacy Alone Won’t Stop the Chinese from Asserting Sovereignty over the South China Sea (Contains links to many previous related articles)
Anti-China riots ripped across Vietnam in May 2014 as the people became aware of China’s illegal land grab in the South China Sea.
The Philippines, Vietnam and other nations have expressed concern that China is building airstrips and sea ports in the South China Sea and looks to be militarizing up to eight islands which have disputed sovereignty issues.
China often encounters maritime patrol aircraft from the U.S. and Japan with Chinese fighter jets. This Chinese J-11 aircraft was photographed by a U.S. Navy P-8 crew over international waters in the South China Sea on August 19, 2014. The U.S. protested the “dangerous airmanship” of the pilot.
Vietnam’s New Russian-Made Submarines Worry China
Japan considering joint U.S. air patrols in South China Sea
Philippines, Viet Nam Work Together on Sea Code of Conduct — China Wants Closer Economic Ties to ASEAN
Pushing Back Against a Chinese Lake in the South China Sea
Fishermen from Vietnam and the Philippines have long complained of rough and unlawful treatment from the Chinese fishermen….
Do Van Nam, the captain of the fishing boat QNg 90226, is pictured gesturing on his boat reportedly damaged by Chinese ships in Vietnamese waters on November 26, 2014.
Fishing boat fishing boat Dna 90152 from Vietnam was rammed by a Chinese Coast Guard ship and sunk last May.
Screenshot of a Chinese Coast Guard vessel ramming a Vietnamese vessel in May 2014
Nguyen Chi Thanh, the owner and captain of fishing boat QNg96093, is seen on his vessel after it was attacked by Chinese forces on January 7, 2015.
Two More Vietnamese Fishing Boats Attacked by Chinese Vessels
Chủ tàu Trần Văn Quang và chiếc mỏ neo bị tàu lạ đâm lút vào mũi tàu. Ảnh: Đức Nguyễn.
Chinese ship attacks Vietnamese fishing boat — Từ Hoàng Sa trở về: Tàu cá Việt bị tàu Trung Quốc đâm tơi tả
Photo: Captain Pham Quang Thanh on the fishing boat that was fired at by a Chinese naval boat off Hoang Sa (Paracel) Islands of Vietnam on March 20, 2013.
Chinese maritime patrol officers stop and search a fishing boat in international waters — a violation of international law
A runway is believed to be among what China will build at the reclaimed Kagitingan (Fiery Cross) Reef off the coast of Palawan. Photo obtained by Rappler
China says it owns all the South China Sea north of the “nine dash line” shown above
China claims ownership of about 90% of the South China Sea. Most of China’s neighbors believe otherwise.