The editor of China’s Science and Technology Daily caused a stir last month when he described “the large gap in science and technology between China and developed countries in the West, including the US” and spoke of the obstacles China faces in catching up with more technologically advanced nations.

It goes against the narrative of technological achievement trumpeted by Beijing, but he was right about how far China lags behind the US.

Image may contain: 1 person, standing and outdoor

Paramilitary police patrol near the headquarters of the Bank of China in Beijing. U.S. cybersecurity researchers say they detect an uptick in Chinese hacking of corporations in the United States. Ng Han Guan AP

If you were to believe much of the media coverage, you would think that China was already a world-beater in technology. Endless news stories recount how China now turns out more graduate engineers each year than any Western country, publishes more scientific research papers and files more patent applications.

However, these statistics indicate little about technological prowess. According to business managers, many of those three million annual science and technology graduates lack crucial analytical and communication skills, and are barely employable. Similarly, a large proportion of those 430,000 research papers have little or no scientific value.

ZTE almost collapsed amid threats the US Commerce Department would not allow American firms to do business with the smartphone-maker. Photo: Reuters

And many of China’s 1.4 million yearly patent applications are destined to prove worthless. In fact, fewer than 20 per cent of China’s applications even claim to be for new inventions; the vast majority are for lower-tier design or utility model patents, which typically cover minor incremental changes to existing products.

Sceptics argue that few of these have any merit, pointing out that the explosion in China’s patent applications in recent years has not been driven by a surge of innovation, but rather by province-level promotion programmes that offer generous subsidies and tax refunds to companies holding local patents.

There’s an obstacle in China’s drive to take on the US in tech: Beijing

In short, quality is not quantity. A more telling measure of China’s relative technological standing is how it performs in the international marketplace. Yes, China exports a lot of hi-tech stuff, but two-thirds of it is produced by foreign companies that like China as a location for low-cost assembly. Many of the high-value components are still shipped in from abroad. China’s biggest single import line by value – exceeding even crude oil – is semiconductor chips.

This dependence on foreign components was brutally exposed in May, when the US Commerce Department briefly barred American companies from doing business with Chinese smartphone-maker ZTE as a punishment for its violation of the terms of an earlier penalty for breaching US sanctions on Iran.

A vehicle operating on Baidu’s Apollo autonomous driving system at the CES Asia 2018 show in Shanghai, China. Photo: Bloomberg

With US semiconductor manufacturers Intel, Broadcom and Qualcomm among ZTE’s top five suppliers, the Chinese company would have been forced to shut down its operations within days had the ban not been reversed.

That was just one incident involving a single Chinese company. China’s broader level of technological innovation can be better gauged by how much it makes from other countries each year in intellectual property rights earnings, compared with how much it pays out.

Artificial intelligence is on the rise in Southeast Asia, helping everyone from fashion designers to rice growers

Inventive economies generate handsome international income streams by licensing their technologies to foreign companies, which then pay them intellectual property royalties.

In 2016, China earned just US$1 billion from the rest of the world in intellectual property payments. In contrast it paid out US$24 billion (and according to many critics, it should have paid a great deal more).

Now compare those numbers with the equivalent figures for the US, which last year earned US$128 billion from licensing its intellectual property to other countries, while paying out US$48 billion. Meanwhile, Japan earned US$35 billion, and paid out US$18 billion.

Chinese visitors watch a robot at the 21st China Beijing International High-Tech Expo in Beijing. Photo: EPA

So while the US earned a net US$80 billion from its innovations, China paid a net US$23 billion for the privilege of using other people’s. This discrepancy gives an idea of the two countries’ relative technological sophistication. Given the sheer scale of the gap, it might seem that the editor of Science and Technology Dailywas right to speak about the difficulties China faces in catching up with the US in technology.

However, it would be wrong to think that China intends to catch up. It doesn’t. Instead, it plans to leapfrog the US and other Western economies to seize global dominance in a range of emerging technologies.

Over the past couple of years, Beijing has rolled out plans to drastically raise China’s game in around 20 hi-tech industries including semiconductors, robotics, aerospace, high-speed rail, electric vehicles, pharmaceuticals and new materials.

Artificial Intelligence: the doctors Chinese patients can’t beat up

Much of the international attention has focused on the old-fashioned import substitution elements of these plans, with Beijing typically aiming for Chinese companies to capture a three-quarter share of the domestic market over the next 10 or so years.

But Beijing’s plans go far beyond import substitution. In semiconductors for example, state planners want Chinese companies to command a third of the international market by 2030. And in artificial intelligence, they are aiming at nothing less than global dominance.

In the coming weeks, Abacus will examine in more detail how exactly China plans to go about pursuing its technological ambitions. At this point, however, it is safe to say that Beijing is prepared to go to great lengths to help it achieve its aims, including by playing dirty. And while such state-sponsored grand plans have a poor record both in China and other countries, this time there is a fair chance that Beijing might just succeed in its bid for global technological supremacy, even though it is starting from so far behind. 


Tom Holland is a former SCMP staffer who has been writing about Asian affairs for more than 20 years


China backed off from hacking U.S. companies. Now it is at it again.