Posts Tagged ‘Tyrone Woods’

Boehner calls for Hillary Clinton to ‘actually cooperate’ with Benghazi probe

April 22, 2015

.

By Scott Wong

The House Select Committee on Benghazi could wrap up its work before 2016 if former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other Obama administration officials “actually cooperate,” Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday.

The Ohio Republican was reacting to reports that Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chairman of the select committee, signaled that his panel likely would not complete its work and publish a report on its findings about the deadly 2012 attack in Libya until 2016 — in the throes of the presidential election.

They could clean this up a whole lot quicker if the administration and former Secretary Clinton were in a position to actually cooperate with the committee and turn over the type of information that we’ve been seeking for some time,” Boehner told reporters at a news conference at the Republican National Committee headquarters.

“But the administration has made it virtually impossible to get to the facts surrounding Benghazi,” he added. “When we have the facts, we’ll have the report.”

Gowdy, whom Boehner appointed last year to lead the panel, had previously indicated he wanted to finish by the end of this year. But it now appears unlikely the committee could analyze the information and publish its findings and conclusions in a report before the end of 2015, a Gowdy spokesman told Bloomberg News.

“Factors beyond the committee’s control, including witness availability, compliance with documents requests, the granting of security clearances and accreditations — all of which are controlled by the  Executive branch — could continue to impact the timing of the inquiry’s conclusion,” spokesman Jamal Ware told The Hill in an email.

There already have been multiple House and Senate probes into the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

The assault happened under Clinton’s watch as secretary of State, but Democrats have accused Republicans of trying to use the issue to bludgeon Clinton amid her run for the White House.

‘#WhyI’mnotvotingforHillary’ hashtag tops Twitter

April 13, 2015

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign announcement was not met with the positive response her team would have been hoping for

By , US Correspondent

The Telegraph

A social media backlash began against Hillary Clinton on Sunday night after the former secretary of state announced her run for the White House.

“#Why Im not voting for Hillary” quickly became the most talked about subject on Twitter in the US in the hours after Mrs Clinton released a video asking for the public’s backing for her 2016 bid to become the America’s first-ever female president.

While many declared their support for the wife of former US president Bill Clinton, a wave of users began using the hashtag giving their reasons for why they would not be voting for the Democratic candidate.

Many criticised her response to the deadly 2012 attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which left four Americans dead, including the ambassador, Christopher Stevens.

Includes video
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11531729/Why-Im-not-voting-for-Hillary-hashtag-tops-Twitter.html

Hillary Clinton during a hearing on the September attacks on US diplomatic sites in Benghazi (Photo: Jason Reed/Reuters)

Sara Teague wrote: #WhyImNotVotingForHillary #Benghazi proved her incompetence and disregard for American lives. Email scandal shows she’s “above the law”

Others cited her apparent lack of transparency, particularly over her use of a private email server during her time in office. It emerged last month Mrs Clinton deleted 30,000 of the emails, which she described as private correspondence.

No true American should need anymore reasons than this one.

Four solid reasons

The hashtag was started by 19-year-old Markeece Young from North Carolina, who describes himself on his Twitter account as a former Democrat-turned-Conservative.

“Well when I heard Hillary was announcing her campaign on Twitter I came up with the Idea to create ‪#‎WhyImNotVotingForHillary‬ it’s simple but very powerful,” he wrote. “It was the #1 trending hashtag in America for about 3 hours.”

Anti-Hillary graffiti also popped up in the New York borough of Brooklyn, where Mrs Clinton’s campaign headquarters will be based.


A poster placed in front of Hillary Clinton’s HQ in Brooklyn, New York (AP)

The street art features portraits of the presidential hopeful alongside phrases including “Don’t Say Secretive”,”Don’t Say Entitled”.

Mrs Clinton made waves before she had even taken up residence.

A group of Haitian protesters – who have accused the Clinton Foundation of stealing money intended for rebuilding their country after the 2010 earthquake – last week gathered outside her building, chanting: “Do we want Clinton for president? Hell no.”

Because of her global profile and the lack of other prominent Democrats in the field, Mrs Clinton enters the race in a position that is perhaps unmatched in modern US presidential politics.

Her tweet announcing her candidacy notched almost 90,000 retweets by the end of the day on Sunday, her campaign video more than 1 million views on YouTube, and her Facebook campaign page almost 500,000 likes.

Impressive, marketing strategists say, although she did create one or two chinks for Republicans to chisel at.

Her 138-second campaign video featured everyday Americans discussing milestones such as starting a business or having a baby, with Mrs Clinton first appearing a full 90 seconds in. It broke a million views on Facebook by Sunday evening.

“It’s less ‘me’ and more ‘us’, which I think is very smart,” said Marissa Gluck, a director at marketing firm Huge.

That’s a really “big difference in tone, ego and professionalism compared to rollout videos from Rand Paul and (Ted) Cruz,” said Josh Cook, a former Obama digital director and vice president of digital engagement for the political consulting firm, BerlinRosen, referring to Republican presidential hopefuls.

But Republicans pushed back hard and fast.

Republican presidential contender Ted Cruz of Texas responded to the “ready for Hillary” message in a crudely cut video asking if Americans wanted “a third Obama term.”

A Google search for “Hillary Clinton for President” resulted in an ad for Hillary’s campaign page, but just below it was an ad for “Pledge to Stop Hillary,” a Republican-created petition.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/hillary-clinton/11531729/Why-Im-not-voting-for-Hillary-hashtag-tops-Twitter.html

Related:

FILE PHOTO NYC PAPERS OUT; Social media use restricted to low res file, max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

.

Pictured: Hillary Clinton, then U.S. Secretary of State, discusses with then China’s Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi at a news conference in Beijing Sept. 5, 2012. Hillary Clinton never made any strong statements of U.S. concern over China’s moves in the South China Sea. Today, China controls several islands in the South China Sea that were uninhabited before the Obama Administration. Today some of the best U.S. allies in Asia like the Philippines and Japan are greatly concerned by China’s rapid rise during the Clinton-Obama years. Photo: AP/Feng Li, Pool

Hillary Clinton and Vladimir Putin. After this photo was taken, Mr. Putin annexed Crimea and “invaded” eastern Ukraine.

Those were fun times, weren’t they?  U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, right, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov press a red button symbolizing the intention to “reset” U.S.-Russian relations during their meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, Friday, March 6, 2009. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton left her post as U.S. Secretary of State with a Russia in military resurgence. The butten meant “reset to the Cold war” wor Putin’s Moscow government. (AP Photo)

‘Huge gaps’ in Clinton emails: Chairman of House Benghazi Committee

No Benghazi Investigation Has Seen Hillary Clinton’s Email

March 4, 2015

.

Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Four Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya were killed in the terrorist attack.

By Alexander Bolton and Martin Matishak

The revelation that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a private email account for government business breathed new life Tuesday into a congressional investigation of Benghazi.

Republicans seized on the news to defend their probe of Clinton’s actions in the lead-up to and aftermath of the deadly 2012 attacks against the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Libya.

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, said the development will likely require Clinton to make several appearances before the panel, possibly stretching the investigation into 2016.

“This revelation, which we have known about … may well lay the groundwork for additional conversations with the secretary in some setting or another,” Gowdy told reporters at a press conference.

GOP strategists say the new revelation ensures scrutiny of Clinton’s handling of Benghazi well into the presidential year.

“The bad news for Mrs. Clinton is it just raises all sorts of questions. What’s in those emails? Is this why they wanted to halt the Benghazi investigation?” said Vin Weber, a Republican strategist who advised Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign.

“It’s hard to see how this comes to a quick, clean end,” Weber added. “I think it just drags on.”

Hillary Clinton at Benghazi hearing in Congress January 23, 2013

Clinton’s camp signaled it viewed the issue seriously by releasing two statements arguing that she had complied with the letter and spirit of the law.

“Like secretaries of State before her, she used her own email account when engaging with any department officials,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said. “For government business, she emailed them on their department accounts, with every expectation they would be retained.”

Clinton’s staff recently shared 55,000 pages of emails with the State Department in response to its request for records, but congressional investigators believe they withheld some documents, raising the possibility that material relevant to their investigation is being kept secret.

Republicans on both sides of the Capitol called for Clinton and her aides to turn over to Congress all private emails she sent and received through a private account during her tenure in the Obama administration, which lasted from 2009 to 2013.

“Our interest is in gaining access [to] all the documents,” Gowdy said. “We want her emails and her documents that are relevant to Benghazi.”

Gowdy said discovery of the private emails gives his panel new impetus to fulfill its task of reviewing all policies, activities and decisions that took place before, during and after the attacks.

“You cannot do that if you do not have all of the documents that would be in the care, custody or control of the Secretary of State at the time,” he said, noting that not even the State Department has access to these documents.

Gowdy declined to speculate on whether Clinton or her aides would face prosecution for not preserving emails on government servers as mandated by the Federal Records Act.

Democrats in recent months have called on Gowdy to wrap up his probe, arguing that all relevant questions about the attacks have been thoroughly reviewed.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the ranking Democrat on the select committee, pushed back against Gowdy’s description of the private email account as a game-changer.

“It has been public for several years that Secretary Clinton used her personal email account, apparently following the pattern of previous secretaries of state,” he said in a statement. “Although Secretary Clinton has produced her emails to the State Department, it is unclear from press reports whether previous Secretaries have done the same.”

But Robert Gibbs, President Obama’s first press secretary, said on NBC’s “Today” that he did not understand why Clinton used her personal account exclusively while at State.

“I think it’s something they’re going to have to explain in good measure today and probably figure out how to get a lot of those emails, or as many as they can back into the archive,” he said.

He called the revelation “highly unusual” because the White House told employees they needed to preserve all of their emails on official accounts.

Gowdy said his committee would approach Clinton, her attorneys and her email providers to obtain the records. His panel plans to send out preservation letters this week instructing Clinton and her camp to preserve any emails that might be relevant to its examination.

The news prompted Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, to suggest he might join the effort to obtain Clinton’s correspondence.

“It’s certainly a violation of the code of conduct of people that are serving in government,” he said. “Obviously, we’re going to have to demand access to those quote ‘private’ emails. There’s no other way to approach it.  You need all full information about Benghazi.”

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/234536-critics-tie-email-to-Benghazi

Related:

FILE - In this Sept. 14, 2012 file photo, Libyan military guards check one of the U.S. consulate's burned buildings after a deadly attack on Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012 in Benghazi. Newly revealed testimony from top military commanders involved in the U.S. response to the Benghazi attacks suggests that the perpetrators of a second, dawn attack on a CIA complex probably were different from those who penetrated the U.S. diplomatic mission the evening before and set it ablaze, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and another American. The second attack, which killed two security contractors, showed clear military training, retired Gen. Carter Ham told Congress in closed-door testimony. (AP Photo/Mohammad Hannon, File)

FILE – In this Sept. 14, 2012 file photo, Libyan military guards check one of the U.S. consulate’s burned buildings after a deadly attack on Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012 in Benghazi. Newly revealed testimony from top military commanders involved in the U.S. response to the Benghazi attacks suggests that the perpetrators of a second, dawn attack on a CIA complex probably were different from those who penetrated the U.S. diplomatic mission the evening before and set it ablaze, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and another American. The second attack, which killed two security contractors, showed clear military training, retired Gen. Carter Ham told Congress in closed-door testimony. (AP Photo/Mohammad Hannon, File) The Associated Press

Islamist militia enjoy the former U.S. Embassy pool in Libya, August 2014

Islamist Group That Killed Americans at Benghazi Blacklisted by U.N., Accused of Terrorism

November 21, 2014

.

The CIA team charged with protecting the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya when it was attacked in 2012 say they were told to 'stand down' for half an hour by a CIA official after the attacks began

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – The U.N. Security Council on Wednesday blacklisted two branches of the Islamist extremist group Ansar al-Sharia in Libya, which Washington says was behind the 2012 Benghazi attack that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

Ansar Al Sharia Benghazi and Ansar Al Sharia Derna, both associated with al Qaeda, were added to the al Qaeda sanctions list and will face an arms embargo and a global travel ban and asset freeze, U.N. diplomats said.

“Both groups are responsible for acts of terror in Libya, including bomb attacks, kidnappings, and murder,” British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said in a statement. Britain, France and the United States initiated the action.

Ansar Al-Sharia is one of a slew of violent political factions and tribal groups fighting for power since the government lost control of the capital, Tripoli.

The U.N. Security Council has had an arms embargo and other sanctions on Libya since 2011, when former leader Muammar Gaddafi cracked down on pro-democracy activists. Gaddafi was ousted from power and killed later that year.

Separate from the U.N. sanctions, the United States is also considering imposing sanctions on Libya’s militants to try to force leaders to negotiate and prevent the country from descending further into chaos.

(Reporting by Mirjam Donath; Edited by David Storey and Ken Wills)

***************************

Militants in Benghazi Attack Tied to a Qaeda Affiliate

The New York Times

CAIRO — The Libyan militant group accused of leading the attack on the United States diplomatic mission in Benghazi two years ago had previously helped train a dozen fighters who went on to participate in a deadly attack on an Algerian gas plant, according to a United Nations Security Council document justifying new sanctions on the group, Ansar al-Shariah.

Later, in the year after the Benghazi attack, Ansar al-Shariah of Benghazi “also provided training and logistical support” to Al Qaeda’s North African affiliate, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the document states, and the Qaeda group in turn helped Ansar al-Shariah orchestrate suicide bombings at the end of 2013 and the following summer.

Witnesses in Benghazi as well as United States officials say that Ansar al-Shariah fighters played a major role in the assault on the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012, killing Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

Read the rest:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/21/world/middleeast/militants-in-benghazi-attack-tied-to-a-qaeda-affiliate.html?ref=world&_r=0

Benghazi documents scrubbed to protect Hillary: former official

September 16, 2014

.

The CIA team charged with protecting the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya when it was attacked in 2012 say they were told to 'stand down' for half an hour by a CIA official after the attacks began

By Marisa Schultz

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton’s minions launched a weekend operation in the basement of the State Department to scrub damning documents related to the Benghazi attacks that killed a US Ambassador, a top former official has charged.

Then-Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell said he walked in uninvited to the Sunday afternoon scene a month after the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist strike to find several boxes of papers — and immediately asked an office director what was happening.

“She told me, ‘Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,’” Maxwell told The Daily Signal, the news outlet for the conservative Heritage Foundation.

The seventh floor is where Clinton — then Secretary of State — and her top advisers had offices.

“I asked her, ‘But isn’t that unethical?’ She responded, ‘Ray, those are our orders.’ ”

The documents were due to be turned over to a review board investigating Benghazi.

Maxwell alleges two of Clinton’s closest confidants were on hand to check on the operation: Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan.

The State Department Monday denied Maxwell’s account and reiterated the review board had access to all documents.

“Any accounts to the contrary … are completely without merit, completely ill-informed,” said state department spokeswoman Marie Harf, noting the review board could collect documents directly from anyone in the department.

Maxwell was interviewed May 30, 2013, by the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, according a Democratic source on the committee.

“Maxwell did not raise this allegation with the congressional investigators despite multiple opportunities to do so,” the source said.

Maxwell, 58, was one of four officials forced out of the State Department immediately after the damning Accountability Review Board report revealed security lapses in the attacks that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and fellow Americans Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

Maxwell was later reinstated and accused Clinton’s team of scapegoating him. He has since retired.

Attempts to reach Maxwell were not successful. But at least one congressman is vouching for his credibility.

“I have no reason not to believe his story,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) who met Maxwell and listened to his claims for more than an hour “a number of months ago.”

He believes Congress should hear from Maxwell as well as Mills and Sullivan.

Chaffetz didn’t make Maxwell’s claims public because “every time we learn something we don’t go out and have a press conference,” he said.

On Wednesday, the newly formed House Select Committee on Benghazi will hold its first public hearing. A committee spokeswoman says the panel intends to look into Maxwell’s claims.

Clinton’s spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

Obama administration pressured Fox News to back off Benghazi reporting

September 8, 2014

.

The CIA team charged with protecting the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya when it was attacked in 2012 say they were told to 'stand down' for half an hour by a CIA official after the attacks began

Men charged with protecting the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya when it was attacked in 2012 say they were told to delay their move to assist Ambassador Stevens and the other Americans who were ultimately killed. They say a CIA official told them to ‘wait” for 30 minutes before supporting the Americans who were under attack.

By Carol Brown

This past Friday, Greta Van Susteren reported on numerous ways the Obama administration has made it difficult for reporters to investigate Benghazi. Van Susteren said that it’s been “like pulling teeth” trying to get answers and that “the Obama administration’s behavior post-Benghazi has been weird; like they’re hiding something.”

She went on to say that as Fox News continued to investigate and press for answers, the administration’s behavior got “even weirder.” She noted two major press conferences – one with the State Department and one with the CIA – when Fox News was not invited. In addition, Van Susteren reported that she was contacted by someone from the administration who told her to dissuade Fox News reporter Jennifer Griffin from continuing to investigate after Griffin reported on the stand down order in Benghazi. Van Susteren said she “thought the call from the Obama administration was dirty.” Van Susteren further reported that “as recently as April, after the administration said it turned over all the information, an email surfaces that had been withheld in the face of repeated requests.” Needless to say, Van Susteren is highly suspicious about what is going on and what the administration is trying to hide.

 

It is glaringly obvious that this administration is extraordinarily secretive and manipulative when it comes to the press. The incident Van Susteren reported on is not the first time the administration has treated the media in a highly inappropriate way, nor is Fox News (though Fox is surely their favorite target) the only media outlet to be on the receiving end of deplorable treatment. I am, however, puzzled as to why Van Susteren is sharing this now, so many months after the fact. I say, expose the left at every turn. Do so in a timely fashion. And hammer away without relent.

.

Hat tip: Gateway Pundit Read more:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/09/obama_ administration_pressured_fox_news_to_back_off_benghazi_ reporting.html#ixzz3ChszIUT2 Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook ‘13 Hours,’ a book written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

‘13 Hours,’ a book written by the five commandos that is due out this week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

U.S. ambassador to Libya ‘would be alive today’ if CIA security team had not been ordered to ‘stand down’ from Benghazi rescue mission

September 5, 2014

‘13 Hours,’ a book written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

‘13 Hours,’ a book written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

The C.I.A. station chief, however, forced the men — all former members of the U.S. Special Forces who were hired as private consultants by the government — to “stand down,” the book said.

  • Ambassador Christopher Stevens killed during 2012 attack in Benghazi
  • Security team based less than a mile away but did not arrive for half an hour
  • New book claims commandos ordered to wait despite being ready to deploy
  • After half an hour the team disobeyed orders in order to help, they say
  • Team believe Stevens and second victim would be alive if they hadn’t waited

By Chris Pleasance for MailOnline

The security team charged with defending the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012 say they were told to ‘stand down’ for nearly half an hour after it was attacked, a new book reveals.

The team, who were stationed in a nearby CIA annex, allege that they were ready to go within five minutes of the attack starting but were ordered not to deploy by a top CIA chief.

Instead they waited in their vehicle before eventually ignoring their orders and moving into battle. By the time they arrived, ambassador Christopher Stevens was dead, along with American Sean Smith.

The team say if they had been allowed to deploy earlier, those men would still be alive.

The CIA team charged with protecting the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya when it was attacked in 2012 say they were told to 'stand down' for half an hour by a CIA official after the attacks began

The CIA team charged with protecting the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya when it was attacked in 2012 say they were told to ‘stand down’ for half an hour by a CIA official after the attacks began

The team say if they had been allowed to deploy immediately Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador, and American Sean Smith would not have been killed

The team say if they had been allowed to deploy immediately Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador, and American Sean Smith would not have been killed

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2744737/REVEALED-U-S-ambassador-Libya-alive-CIA-security-team-not-ordered-stand-Benghazi-rescue-mission-new-book-reveals.html#ixzz3CS35Ka7a
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The team say if they had been allowed to deploy immediately Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador, and American Sean Smith would not have been killed

Speaking to Fox News, commando John Tiegen, said: ‘I strongly believe if we’d left immediately, they’d still be alive today.’

 

Christopher Stevens suffocated in the attack after the consulate compound was set alight

Christopher Stevens suffocated in the attack after the consulate compound was set alight

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2744737/REVEALED-U-S-ambassador-Libya-alive-CIA-security-team-not-ordered-stand-Benghazi-rescue-mission-new-book-reveals.html#ixzz3CS3M4F00
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

More…

In a new book called 13 Hours, Tiegen and four of his colleagues discuss what happened that night for the first time from a soldier’s perspective.

They say word of the attack first reached the CIA building at 9.30pm, and they got ready in such a hurry that one of the team forgot to put underwear on, while another was dressed in cargo shorts.

Christopher Stevens suffocated in the attack after the consulate compound was set alight

But as they climbed into their vehicle fully armed and ready to go, a commander identified only as ‘Bob’, told them to wait.

Tiegen recalls telling the commander, ‘Hey, we gotta go now! We’re losing the initiative!’ but was told ‘No, stand down, you need to wait,’ reports the New York Times.

According to the commandos, the chief later told them that Libyan militias were being called in, but the Libyan guards at the consulate compound deserted without firing a shot, and no other support ever came.

Eventually, the commandos received a radio message from the compound: ‘If you guys do not get here, we are going to die!’ At that point, in defiance of their orders, the men went to help.

At around 10.30pm the team made it into the compound and rounded up the surviving personnel before loading them into a convoy.

They were unable to find ambassador Stevens, who by that time had died from suffocation after the buildings had been set alight.

As the team moved out of the diplomatic compound their convoy was attacked, and once they were inside the CIA annex, that too became the target of rocket and small arms fire.

These patchy attacks went on for roughly 90 minutes as the commandos fought on-and-off battles with gunmen lurking in side streets and alleyways.

Around the same time, a CIA security team based in Tripoli, which included two U.S. military officers, landed at Benghazi airport.

In a new book, the security team say they were told three times not to deploy, before eventually ignoring their orders and driving to the beseiged compound

In a new book, the security team say they were told three times not to deploy, before eventually ignoring their orders and driving to the beseiged compound

The commandos say officials tried to bring in local Libyan militias to help, along with heavier weapons, but no meaningful support materialised until the next morning

The commandos say officials tried to bring in local Libyan militias to help, along with heavier weapons, but no meaningful support materialised until the next morning

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2744737/REVEALED-U-S-ambassador-Libya-alive-CIA-security-team-not-ordered-stand-Benghazi-rescue-mission-new-book-reveals.html#ixzz3CS3VENXz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The commandos say officials tried to bring in local Libyan militias to help, along with heavier weapons, but no meaningful support materialised until the next morning

Not long before dawn, the reinforcements from Tripoli managed to take themselves and a convoy of vehicles to the CIA base to prepare for an evacuation.

Just after they arrived mortars began firing on the base, killing another two security officers after they took a direct hit from one of the shells.

It took until 5.30am, a full nine hours after the attack began, for Libyan security forces to arrive with heavy weapons.

A security services spokesman denied the claims, saying: ‘A prudent, fast attempt was made to rally local support for the rescue effort and secure heavier weapons.’

The official said ‘there was no second-guessing those decisions being made on the ground’ and ‘there were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support.’

 

Read more:

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2744737/REVEALED-U-S-ambassador-Libya-alive-CIA-security-team-not-ordered-stand-Benghazi-rescue-mission-new-book-reveals.html#ixzz3CS2HVoTu Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Related:

 

Does the truth matter? Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, testifying before a congressional committee investigating the deaths of four Americans at Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. This appears to be her testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on January 23, 2013. She said during Congressional testimony, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Benghazi: CIA chief reportedly stopped 5 American commandos from responding to attack

September 5, 2014

New Book ‘13 Hours,’  written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Friday, September 5, 2014
.
A CIA station chief reportedly stopped five American commandos from responding  to the attack on a U.S. diplomatic base in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, it was reported Thursday. Pictured a  protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames.
CIA station chief reportedly stopped five American commandos from responding  to the attack on a U.S. diplomatic base in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, it was reported Thursday. Pictured a  protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames. Photo credit ESAM OMRAN AL-FETORI/REUTERS

A C.I.A. station chief reportedly stopped five American commandos from responding immediately to the attack on a U.S. diplomatic base in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012 that left four Americans dead, it was reported Thursday.

“13 Hours,” a book written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy .

Four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, were killed when terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012.

“If you guys do not get here, we are going to die!” a diplomatic security agent said over the radio to the commandos, according to The Times.

‘13 Hours,’ a book written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

‘13 Hours,’ a book written by the five commandos that is due out next week, says the C.I.A chief had them wait in a car for 20 minutes while the attack took place about a mile away, according to The New York Times, which obtained a copy.

The C.I.A. station chief, however, forced the men — all former members of the U.S. Special Forces who were hired as private consultants by the government — to “stand down,” the book said.

“13 Hours” is the first account of the Benghazi attack to surface from witnesses to the event, which sparked a frenzy of criticism from conservatives who blamed President Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for the deadly security breach.

The C.I.A. station chief, named “Bob,”was acting on his own orders, according to The Times. He wanted to wait for help from Libyan allies on the ground.

Four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens (pictured), were killed when terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

Four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens (pictured), were killed when terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. Photo: Ben Curtis/AP

Ambassador Stevens and computer specialist Sean Smith died from smoke inhalation while waiting for help to arrive. Former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed when the commandos finally ignored “Bob’s” order and stormed the burning compound, The Times reported.

A senior intelligence official told The Times that “a prudent, fast attempt was made to rally local support for the rescue effort and secure heavier weapons.”

The official said “there were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support,” according to the newspaper.

The five commandos who survived the rescue effort co-authored ‘13 Hours,’ with assistance from Mitchell Zuckoff, of Boston University.

The five commandos who survived the rescue effort co-authored ‘13 Hours,’ with assistance from Mitchell Zuckoff, of Boston University. Photo: © Esam Al-Fetori / Reuters/REUTERS

Two of the commandos opted to remain anonymous; the others are Mark Geist, Kris Paronto and John Tiegen.

The commandos, fully armed, waited in cargo vehicles for help from Libyan allies that never came, as hundreds of armed militants stormed the embassy and burned everything in sight. Photographs after the attack showed the sacked compound. There were bloody handprints staining its walls, and it was full of charred, smoldering rubble.

gotis@nydailynews.com

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/cia-chief-reportedly-stops-5-commandos-responding-benghazi-attack-book-article-1.1928871#ixzz3CQjnRPaB

****************************

New Book Says C.I.A. Official in Benghazi Held Up Rescue

The New York Times

Five commandos guarding the C.I.A. base in Benghazi, Libya, in September 2012 say that the C.I.A. station chief stopped them from interceding in time to save the lives of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and an American technician during the attack on the diplomatic mission there.

Read the rest:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/05/world/africa/new-book-says-cia-official-in-benghazi-held-up-rescue.html?_r=0

The American Mission in Benghazi, Libya, during the 2012 attack. Five C.I.A. contractors who were nearby say they were told not to intervene. Credit Esam Omran Al-Fetori/Reuters

Obama’s Claim He Had “al Qaeda On The Run” Resulted in Benghazi “Coverup”, Journalist Edward Klein Says

June 22, 2014

.

U.S. commandos and the FBI captured Ahmed Abu Khattala, said to be one of the masterminds behind the 2012 consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya

If the truth about Benghazi became known, it would blow that argument out of the water.

In his new book, “Blood Feud,” journalist Edward Klein gets inside the dysfunctional, jealous relationship between Bill and Hillary Clinton and Barack and Michelle Obama. Here, he explains what happened the night of the Benghazi attack.

By Edward Klein

By 10 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2012, when Hillary Clinton received a call from President Obama, she was one of the most thoroughly briefed officials in Washington on the unfolding disaster in Benghazi, Libya.

She knew that Ambassador Christopher Stevens and a communications operator were dead, and that the attackers had launched a well-coordinated mortar assault on the CIA annex, which would cost the lives of two more Americans. She had no doubt that a terrorist attack had been launched against America on the anniversary of 9/11.

However, when Hillary picked up the phone and heard Obama’s voice, she learned the president had other ideas in mind. With less than two months before Election Day, he was still boasting that he had al Qaeda on the run. If the truth about Benghazi became known, it would blow that argument out of the water.

“Hillary was stunned when she heard the president talk about the Benghazi attack,” one of her top legal advisers said in an interview. “Obama wanted her to say that the attack had been a spontaneous demonstration triggered by an obscure video on the Internet that demeaned the Prophet Mohammed.”

This adviser continued: “Hillary told Obama, ‘Mr. President, that story isn’t credible. Among other things, it ignores the fact that the attack occurred on 9/11.’ But the president was adamant. He said, ‘Hillary, I need you to put out a State Department release as soon as possible.’”

After her conversation with the president, Hillary called Bill Clinton, who was at his penthouse apartment in the William J. Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, and told him what Obama wanted her to do.

“I’m sick about it,” she said, according to the legal adviser, who was filled in on the conversation.

“That story won’t hold up,” Bill said.

“I know,” Hillary said. “I told the president that.”

“It’s an impossible story,” Bill said. “I can’t believe the president is claiming it wasn’t terrorism. Then again, maybe I can. It looks like Obama isn’t going to allow anyone to say that terrorism has occurred on his watch.”

Hillary’s legal adviser provided further detail:

“During their phone call, Bill started playing with various doomsday scenarios, up to and including the idea that Hillary consider resigning as secretary of state over the issue. But both he and Hillary quickly agreed that resigning wasn’t a realistic option. If her resignation hurt Obama’s chances of winning re-election, her fellow Democrats would never forgive her. Hillary was already thinking of running for president in 2016, and her political future, as well as Obama’s, hung in the balance.”

Obama had put Hillary in a corner, and she and Bill didn’t see a way out. And so, shortly after 10 o’clock on the night of September 11, she released an official statement that blamed the Benghazi attack on an “inflammatory posted on the Internet.”

The Benghazi Deception was in full swing.

“Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas” by Edward Klein is out this week from Regnery Publishing.

http://nypost.com/2014/06/22/clinton-bristled-at-benghazi-deception-book/


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,027 other followers